Following the Supreme Court's ruling in Jerman v. Carlisle, McNellie, Rini, Kramer & Ulrich LPA, 559 U.S. 573 (2010), it is clear that the bona fide error defense set forth in section 1692k(c) of the Fair Debt Collection Practices Act, 15 U.S.C. § § 1692 to 1692p (the "FDCPA"), "does not apply to a violation of the FDCPA resulting from a debt collector's incorrect interpretation of the requirements of th[e FDCPA]." Id. at 604-05. But as the district court recently recognized in Gray v. Suttell & Associates et al., a putative FDCPA class action filed in the Eastern District of ...
Posts tagged credit card debt.
Posted in: FDCPA
Tags: burr forman, Consumer Finance Litigation, Consumer Finance Litigation blog, credit card debt, fair debt collection practices act, fdcpa, First Consumer National Bank, Gray Order, Gray v. Suttell & Associates, Jerman v. Carlisle McNellie Rini Kramer & Ulrich LPA, Statute-of-Limitation, UCC, Uniform Commercial Code