Posts tagged Moot Case.
The writing was on the wall following Justice Elena Kagan's dissent in Genesis Healthcare Corp. v. v. Symczyk, 133 S. Ct. 1523 (2013), wherein Justice Kagan blasted the view that an unaccepted offer of complete relief made to a named plaintiff pursuant to Fed. R. Civ. P. 68 is capable of mooting the plaintiff's individual (and putative class) claims as "wrong, wrong, and wrong again," id. at 1533 (Kagan, J., dissenting) - a position that every Court of Appeals to rule on the issue after Genesis Healthcare had adopted - and on January 20, 2016, the Supreme Court made it official. In a 6-3 ...
Posted in: TCPA, U.S. Supreme Court
Tags: burr forman, Consumer Finance Litigation, Consumer Finance Litigation & Arbitration, Consumer Finance Litigation blog, Genesis Healthcare Corp., Individual Claim, Justice Elena Kagan, Justice Ruth Bader Ginsburg, Moot Case, supreme court, Symczyk, tcpa, telephone consumer protection act