In Stuart-Findlay v. Bank of America, N.A., 2010CA014370, 41 Fla. L. Weekly D207a (Fla. 4th DCA 2014), Florida's Fourth District Court of Appeal held that a clerk's default entered in error should have been set aside, regardless of the defendant's alleged failure to demonstrate excusable neglect, meritorious defenses, or due diligence. The facts of the case were not in dispute. At the time the clerk's default was entered, the defendant had served various papers in the action. As a result, pursuant to Fla. R. Civ. P. 1.500 the Court, and not the Clerk, was the proper party to enter a ...
Posts tagged Stuart-Findlay v. Bank of America.
Posted in: Florida
Tags: burr forman, clerk's default, Consumer Finance Litigation, Consumer Finance Litigation & Arbitration, Consumer Finance Litigation blog, default, Florida's Fourth District Court of Appeal, Rule 1.500, Stuart-Findlay v. Bank of America