Last week the Fifth Circuit weighed in on how inartfully crafted arbitration and forum-selection clauses might trump one another. Together with recent decisions from the Second and Ninth Circuits - each with cert petitions pending - the issue seems poised for Supreme Court determination. Forum-Selection vs Arbitration Pending Supreme Court? The Second and Ninth Circuits held that a subsequent contractual forum-selection clause requiring all disputes to be resolved in a specified federal-court trumps FINRA's base requirement that FINRA member firms must arbitrate upon a ...
The MSRB last week proposed an extension of its gift-limitations Rule G-20 to encompass municipal advisors. The Proposed Rule generally limits gifts in relation to municipal securities or advisory services to $100 per year. The limit excludes normal-course (not excessive) business entertainment or sponsorships, transaction commemoratives, or personal gifts (e.g. birthdays, weddings). Comments on the G-20 proposal are due by December 8 and the MSRB will hold a webinar on the release November 13. See MSRB Reg. Not. 2014-18, here. The MSRB also has proposed amendments extending ...
The SEC last week approved new MSRB Rule G-44 implementing supervision and compliance requirements for municipal advisors. The MSRB touted the Rule as "its first dedicated rule for municipal advisors" under the Dodd-Frank mandate for greater regulation of the nation's municipal-securities markets. See MSRB Reg. Not. 2014-19, here. New Rule G-44 requires Municipal Advisors to follow the same supervision and compliance regime otherwise applicable to registered broker-dealers under FINRA Rules 3110- 3130. It requires, among others: - Written supervisory procedures ...
The drumbeats of discontent grow louder against the SEC's more frequent use of its internal administrative forum for enforcement cases. I wrote about the current spate of Constitutional challenges to the agency's forum in an October 9 Law360 article, A Renewed Fight Over SEC's Admin Forum's Constitutionality, here. The SEC instituted administrative proceedings accusing Canadian Jordan Peixoto of insider-trading in options on shares of Herbalife Ltd. in advance of a hedge fund's announcement of its short position in the stock. See In re Peixoto, Admin. Proc. File No. 3-16184 ...
Since 2004, FINRA has required its member firms to include in settlement-agreement confidentiality clauses an exception expressly allowing a customer to respond to regulatory inquiries. See Notice to Members 04-44. FINRA recently updated that requirement to include express permission to be a whistleblower. FINRA's suggested language provides: Any non-disclosure provision in this agreement does not prohibit or restrict you (or your attorney) from initiating communications directly with, or responding to any inquiry from, or providing testimony before, the SEC, FINRA, any ...
Carlo DiFlorio, FINRA's Chief Risk Officer and Head of Strategy, told the annual meeting of the National Society of Compliance Professionals Monday that FINRA is emphasizing efforts to mitigate market risks, even as it regards US capital-market integrity as at its strongest historically. HFT & Algorithmic Trading DiFlorio addressed thee initiatives. First, FINRA examiners are focusing on firms' supervision of HFT and algorithmic trading, including pre-implementation testing and firm-wide "kill switch" procedures when something goes awry. Second, FINRA's Board decided ...
The US Sixth Circuit last week narrowed its standard for adequately pleading scienter in PSLRA cases using a collective-knowledge theory to impute knowledge to a corporate defendant from among various employees. In Omnicare, the Court limited collective-knowledge scienter by imposing the helpful, but unremarkable, requirement that such a pleading demonstrate a reasonably close connection between the collectively-held-knowledge and the issuance of the misstatement (or decision not to correct a prior omission). In re Omnicare, Inc. Securities Litigation, No. 13-5597 (6th
Ruling in a case of first impression, the Sixth Circuit rejected an implied cause of action under Section 36(a) of the Investment Company Act of 1940, 15 U.S.C. § 80a-1 et seq. Although the Circuits remain split, recent decisions (after 2001) agree on the point. Two pension funds sued an exchange-traded fund (ETF), its investment advisor (IA) and its trust-company-affiliate (BTC), claiming BTC's Lending Agent fee "' 35% of all net revenue on the ETF's securities-lending activity - was excessive. The Court affirmed dismissal of the express Section 36(b) claim for breach of fiduciary ...