In In re Petrobras Securities Litigation, the Second Circuit Court of Appeals recently issued an opinion regarding the standards for certifying a class involving foreign securities. Petrobras is a multinational Brazilian gas company whose value has declined due to the exposure of money-laundering and a kickback scheme, which prompted a class action by holders of Petrobras equity and debt.
The District Court certified two classes under Rule 23 relating to claims under the Securities Act of 1933 and the Securities Exchange Act of 1934. Since the notes do not trade on any U.S.-based ...
It's hornbook law that a later intentional breach of contract, alone, doesn't equal promissory fraud.
Holding it therefore cannot establish mail or wire fraud, the Second Circuit reversed the Government's $1.2 Billion FIRREA judgment against Countrywide, Bank of America and others, with instructions to dismiss the case. The case started as a qui tam action alleging that Countrywide's "high-speed swim lane" process delivered substandard mortgage loans to GSEs (Fannie, Freddie) during performance of master mortgage-loan sales agreements ("MLSAs") executed earlier. The ...
Affirming dismissal of some lingering Morgan Keegan bond fund actions, the Sixth Circuit joined the Second in holding that American Pipe class-action tolling does not affect the expiration of a statute of repose. The Court reasoned that, whether equitable or procedural, American Pipe cannot supersede the substantive extinction of a legal right by repose. The Tenth Circuit has held that American Pipe tolls statutes of repose pending class certification. Joseph v. Wiles, 223 F. 3d 1155 (10th Cir. 2000). The Second Circuit said not. Police & Fire Ret. Sys. Of City of Detroit v. IndyMac ...
On April 29, the United States Court of Appeals entered an amended order (previously decided on March 17, 2016) that affirmed the decision of the United States District Court for the Southern District of New York in DeKalb County Pension Fund v. Transocean Ltd., Robert L. Long, Jon A. Marshall, and Transocean Inc.
The central issues in the case were (i) what statute of repose applies to a § 14(a) claim under the Securities Exchange Act of 1934? and (ii) when does the statute of repose began to run? This was a particularly thorny question because the private right of action in § 14(a) is ...