Recent decisions try to clarify insider trading liability, but may have caused more confusion. In United States v. Newman, 773 F.3d 438 (2d Cir. 2014), the Second Circuit explained that to be convicted of insider trading, the tippee must have knowledge that the insider tipper disclosed information in exchange for a personal benefit. What does this mean? In Newman, the tipper and tippee attended business school together and had been colleagues, but they were not "close." The tippee provided career advice and assistance to tipper, but the advice began before the tipper gave the ...
Posts tagged United States v. Newman.
Posted in: Insider Trading Litigation
Tags: burr forman, insider trading liability, insider-trading, quid pro quo, securities litigation, Securities Litigation & Arbitration, To Tip or Not to Tip?, United States v. Newman, United States v. Salman