On November 2, 2015, the United States Supreme Court heard oral argument in Spokeo v. Robins, which raises the question of what constitutes requisite injury to support a claim for violation of the Fair Credit Reporting Act. In Spokeo, Plaintiff filed a class action Complaint against Defendant, accusing Defendant of violating the FCRA by publishing false information about him. The trial court dismissed Plaintiff's claim, concluding Plaintiff had not experienced the requisite harm to sustain a claim. The U.S. Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit reversed, holding that violation ...
Posts tagged U.S. Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit.
Posted in: Fair Credit Reporting Act, Standing
Tags: burr and forman, burr forman, Fair Credit Reporting Act, fcra, requisite injury, Spokeo v. Robins, tcpa, telephone consumer protection act, U.S. Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit