- Filip Factor Revisions.
In order for a company to receive any consideration for cooperation under this section, the company must identify all individuals involved in or responsible for the misconduct at issue, regardless of their position, status or seniority, and provide to the Department all facts relating to that misconduct. If a company seeking cooperation credit declines to learn of such facts or to provide the Department with complete factual information about the individuals involved, its cooperation will not be considered a mitigating factor under this section.
Id. (emph. added). The basic cooperation principles are not new, but as Yates emphasized in her address:What is new is the consequence of not doing it. In the past, cooperation credit was a sliding scale of sorts and companies could still receive at least some credit for cooperation, even if they failed to fully disclose all facts about individuals. That's changed now. As the policy makes clear, providing complete information about individuals' involvement in wrongdoing is a threshold hurdle that must be crossed before we'll consider any cooperation credit.
(emph. added). Additionally, the revisions encourage corporate disclosures early and often - on a rolling basis - valuing corporate cooperation over the life of an internal investigation over awaiting a completed "report." See Sec. 9-28.700 n. 1. § 9-28.720 A revised section on Disclosure of Relevant Facts, focusing on factual disclosures, while preserving the privilege so long as it is not used to shield facts. § 9-28.900 A new section on Voluntary Disclosure to bring self-reporting into line with similar provisions of other federal and regulatory agencies (e.g. SEC). § 9-28.1100 & -1200 Revised sections on Alternatives to beef up DOJ emphasis on considering NPAs and DPAs, or civil or regulatory enforcement actions, as alternatives to criminal indictment or declination. § 9-28.1300 A new section requiring consideration of whether individual prosecutions satisfy prosecutorial goals when determining whether to charge a corporation.- Civil
- Coordination in Parallel proceedings
- Partner
Tom Potter is a Partner in the firm's Nashville office, and his practice focuses on securities, corporate disputes, and appellate litigation. Tom has over 35 years of experience representing business interests.
Tom represents ...